A ticket to modernity or cultural vandalism? MADELEINE RAJTOVÁ considers whether language death matters

EVEN THOUGH there are only 195 countries in the world, the number of spoken languages in 2021 is significantly higher – 7,139 according to Ethnologue.

But this is by no means a constant number, as 40% of those languages are considered ‘endangered’, often having less than 1,000 speakers left. In fact, 97% of the population speak only 4% of those languages [see below], whilst only 3% of the population speak the other 96% of languages (UNESCO). This is an alarming ratio, but what is even more startling is that every two weeks, a language dies, according to Strochlic (2018) in  National Geographic. They even predict that 50-90% of the languages will have disappeared by the next century.

One example is the Eyak language that used to be spoken in southern Alaska, before its last native speaker died (see Pemberton and Townsend, 2008). Marie Smith Jones was known to be the world’s last speaker of her native language and as she did not pass on her knowledge to younger generations the language died out. To preserve the language, she worked together with linguists to compile a dictionary and grammar. Now it depends on the people and their will to learn and to resurrect the Eyak language.

Marie Smith Jones, the last person to speak Eyak, who died in 2008

But how do languages disappear? The linguist David Crystal names some of the causes that can lead to the extinction of a language. These include natural disasters that wipe out whole populations, genocide or cultural assimilation as a consequence of colonialism.

Is English killing other languages?

Colls (2009) cites the French linguist Hagege who claims that English may ‘kill’ most of the languages if we disregard how it is progressing. According to Ethnologue, English is the language that counts the most speakers, next to Mandarin Chinese, Hindi and Spanish. But….. with English being spoken in 146 countries, only one quarter of those are native speakers, the rest being people who acquired English as a second language. Kenan Malik, an Indian-born British writer, calls the acquisition of a world language like English or Spanish a “ticket to modernity” (Malik, 2000). He is convinced that most languages do not simply die out, but instead people choose to learn a world language and abandon their native one in order to have a better life.

But abandoning your native language to have a better future goes hand in hand with losing a piece of your own identity. The effects of this pressure cannot be left disregarded. Ethnologue editor Paul Lewis states that “if people begin to think of their language as useless, they see their identity as such as well” (Colls, 2009). He also explains that if parents stop teaching their children their native language, family ties are broken and traditions are lost. In many cases this leads to “social disruption, depression, suicide and drug use” and this is exactly what is happening on the Navajo Reservation in the United States. Hernandez (2021) reveals that American Indians and Alaskan Natives are most affected by depression and suicide compared to other ethnic groups in the US. She states that the reasons for this are “cultural identity and self perception”, “chronic stressors” and “integrational trauma”. So, the “ticket to modernity” might be considered as something positive by many people, but what is the price they are paying? And can we really talk about a free choice if the other option does not offer a liveable future?

What do we win or lose when languages ‘die’?

This may seem like a paradox, but Malik (2000) does indeed claim that the fewer languages we have, the easier life will be. This is because for him language has only one purpose – communication. He even says, that languages that are spoken by only a few people are not languages but more like a “child’s secret code”. Therefore, if a language does not fulfil its only purpose, it does not matter if it becomes extinct. He does not consider, however, that even if it is spoken by only a small number of people, it does fulfil this purpose within the community of those people. And since according to Colls (2009), languages are “living, breathing organisms holding the connections and associations that define a culture” that culture will be lost as soon as the language is lost.

Malik, on the other hand, says that “the more universally we can communicate, the more dynamic our cultures will be”, which means that according to him the countless cultures our world includes are not accessible to most of the population because of communication barriers. Hence if everyone was speaking the same language, it would be easier to familiarise oneself with all the existing cultures. Most linguists are convinced that language is much more than just a means of communication. Nettle and Romaine (2000: 6) state that “languages are intimately connected with humans, our cultures and our environment” and therefore language cannot be simply regarded as a means to an end. Crystal (1999) compares languages to animals or plants that are dying out and says that when a language is lost our planet loses “intellectual and cultural diversity”.

But what if people are not interested in keeping their native language alive?

Of course, the increasing importance of global languages elicits a lot of pressure and demands people to learn these languages. But an interesting question is – why do so many people decide to give up their bilingualism, as speaking one language does not automatically exclude the possibility of speaking another language? If parents decide that their native language is not useful for their children, they decide over their heads without offering them an option. Crystal explains that using the native language is often accompanied by shame. What if it only needs a change of perspective? Would it make a difference if all the bilingual people who still speak their native language found pride in it?

MADELEINE RAJTOVÁ, English Language undergraduate, University of Chester, UK

References

Colls, T. (2009, October 19). The death of language? BBC.

Crystal, D. (1999, October 25). Death sentence. The Guardian.

Ethnologue: Languages of the World. How many languages are there in the world?

Ethnologue: Languages of the World. What is the most spoken language?

Hernandez, C. (2021). Addressing Major Depressive Disorder in Navajo Adolescents.

Malik, K. (2000, November 20). Let them die. Prospect Magazine.

Nettle, S. & Romaine, S. (2000). Vanishing voices: The extinction of the world’s languages. Oxford    & New York: Oxford University Press.

Pemberton, M. & Townsend, L. (2008, February 3). Last fluent speaker of Eyak passes away. Indian Country.

Strochlic, N. (2018, April 16). The Race to Save the World’s Disappearing Languages. National Geographic.            

UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO launches the first website for the International Year of Indigenous Languages (IYIL2019).